Chateau De Fontainebleau: Decorative Themes

Chateau De Fontainebleau decorative ThemesSixteenth Century Decoration at the Chateau de FontainebleauThe ornamentation at Fontainebleau, the proud hunting lodge of Francois I, was lead by Rosso Fiorentino in 1530. In 1532 Rosso was fall in by Francesco Primaticcio, who held the position of first importance at Fontainebleau after the ending of Rosso in 15401. In 1552 Niccol dellAbbate arrived at Fontainebleau, and together with Primaticcio decorated the Gallery of Ulysses in the Palace. Much of the original work has been lost and what remains has needed to be heavily restored. This essay will look at the style characteristics of the palm visible today focusing on the frescoes in the Gallery of Francois I and the bronze ministration by Cellini.The latent themes in the decoration of the chateau atomic number 18 typically runative of the Mannerist style of art that took a hold crossways Europe during the 1500s. As Bosquet phrases it, mannerism is not a simple phenomenon it i s idealism, further it is withal naturalism it is evasion, stallionly it is overly joy of c arer and consent in the future.2 The changing nature of the social and economic climate led to experimentation and absorption in the arts, and to pioneering styles which would be followed during later decades.In The august Elephant by Rosso (http//www.musee-chateau-fontainebleau.net.).the form of the elephant, which attributeises Wisdom and Loyalty3 dominates the composition. Sixteenth century royalty prime themselves for being talented and learned qualities which would ultimately lead to wisdom, strength and honour. Baldass be Castiglione, in his Cortegiano (1528)4, cites the talents which a good courtier should possess. The courtier was versed in all the sports (riding, fencing, wrestling, swimming) he had, in addition to strength and skill, acquired grace and elegance of movement by practicing terpsichore and gymnastics (..) should know not only the Latin language, but also Greek , that he should be head versed in the whole kit and caboodle of the poets and, furthermore, that he should be proficient in writing both prose and verse. It is kind of probable that the composition of The Elephant is designed to reflect these qualities in King Francois I himself. The animal is placed centrally, with the surrounding pictures face beneath and idler it, thereof drawing attention to its sheer size and presence. The sculpted dragon, a symbol of strength and courage, takes central place above the delineation of the fresco in both the dragon and the elephant exceptional attention has been paid to the clarity of term in the gentle curves of their forms. These shapes are reflected in the curving beautify surrounds which are moulded to reach into the picture, thus drawing the eye into the scene. The lushly decorative surrounds degree the beginning of a trend of such decoration (which would later be imitated in paint) which continued within the School of Fontain ebleau. Stucco was an antique average which was rediscover in the 16th century and encouraged the invention of exotic and oddly fluid conjunctions of forms.5 Here we see twisted scroll-like forms framing the picture. The scene depicts a number of figures, crowded in places, creating a close to chaotic automated teller this is juxtaposed against the serenity of the great elephant which stands rider less. This could suggest that Rosso was intending to reflect not only the character of Fontainebleaus inhabitants, but also the character of the chateau itself. In other words, the serenity amidst the chaos could here represent the rural harbour of the princely court set apart from the public chaos of the city.During the sixteenth century it was not uncommon to for artists to be both painters and sculptors. In fact, fit in to Hauser6, French mannerism produced incomparably more works in shape than in video. Francesco Primatticio first combined allegorical painting in moulded pla sterwork at Fontainebleau a style that was to influence the later baroque and fancy decoration. In plate 198 (Hauser, 1965) a mural decoration originally by Primaticcio, the actual mural appears small in size to the surrounding decoration, the elaborate frame almost becoming more of import than the picture itself. The adorn framing is treated as if it were leather or paper, slashed and trilled into the fine detail of fruit and the gently curving fe manful figures. In plate 198 there is a suggestion of early eroticism the part revealed naked upper bodies of the women figures becomes a popular theme in expressive sixteenth century art. There too can be seen the mythic figure Pan with goats horns, and in Danae, plate 1997, the winged cherub signifies the highest ranking of the pecking order of angels8. These images represent the extremes of experience sought after in an age of sensuality. Primaticcio expresses the red-blooded enjoyment of the era with the image of Pan who re presents hedonism, and in direct contrast the spiritual refinement of the cherub suggests the richness of sixteenth century spiritual life where dreams and visions were of great inspiration to artists. brusk9 suggests that Primaticcios style, as it can be seen from his drawings for the Chambre du Roi and from the mantelpiece from the Chambre de la Reine was influenced by his time spent in Mantua,10 where he put to death pure friezes in the Sala degli Stucchi in the Palazzo del TThe fruit swags on the mantelpiece sequestrate those in the Palazzo del T, and the sphinxes are cousins of those in the Sala di Fetonte. The general design is authorized in its emphasis on circular and square panels, but the proportions of the figures are elongated like those in the stuccos on the vault of the Sala degli Stucchi. The whole effect, moreover, is richer than anything to be seen in Mantua, mainly because of the higher relief.11It appears that the artists who decorated the palace in France were expanding the ideas which they had been running(a) on in Italy. As can be seen from the Galerie dUlysse more or less of the decoration was extremely complex and took many years to bonk. The gallery was of immense length, and fill up the whole side of the Cour du Cheval Blanc on the first floor. The walls were decorated with a serial of paintings illustrating the story of Ulysses which, as Blunt suggests, show Primaticcio as a overlook of academic design in a style more bear upon than previously by Michelangelesque influence, particularly in the scenes of violent action.12The appearing of The Salle de Bal differs as the form of the building was more difficult to decorate. The zones and the poses under the windowpane embrasures were decorated by Primaticcio probably between 1552 and 1556. The condition of surviving paintings is poor, but from drawings made (Hauser, plate 43A) we can see that Primaticcio intended a biradial design not unlike Raphaels decorations in the F arnesina.13 This design works well in the limited lieu available and differs to Raphaels work as it depicts whole scenes rather than two or three figure groups. be employed by the royal courts had a significant effect on the artists style of the decoration at Fontainebleau. Paul III declared, when Benvenuto Cellini was brought before him impeach of murder, that such a man was above the laws14. While being held in high esteem allowed the artists considerable independence in their work they had also to consider what their patrons expected and required of them. Cellinis bronze relief houri of Fontainebleau was originally designed for the Porte Doree15 but it was never installed at Fontainebleau. The grand fenestella (409205 cm) illustrates the legend of the chteaus origins, and because of the importance of its intended position it had to be strikingly beautiful and symbolic. The nymph encircles the neck of a stag, an emblem of the King, and it is thought that the relief was inspired by an image by Rosso now only cognize through an engraving by Pierre Milan16. According to the local legend, a hunting dog named Bleau found a nymph beside a fresh-water bounce. The spring and, consequently, the chteau both took the name Fontainebleau. In Rossos engraving the reclining nymph lies among the rushes, with her remaining offshoot around an urn. She is nude but her legs are bent slightly at the knees for modestys sake. Marsengil suggests that Cellini expands this imagery to describe, not simply the memorial of the nymphs discovery, but the very idea of the nymph as the personification of the royal hunting lodge. (..) she has three urns under her left arm from which flowing and curling representations of water pour. These, as well as the billow drapery that frames her, identify the female figure as the presiding deity.17 Cellinis figure stretches across the entire scene so that her nudity is not covered this represents the boldness and sanctity with which Cellini del iberately associated the King and his wife, and also reflects the dynamism with which he executed his works at Fontainebleau.As well as exploring brand-new territory with figurative painting, the Fontainebleau artists such as Nicolo dellAbbate also create landscapes. As Arnold Hauser says of dellAbbate as a landscape painter he enriched mannerism with a new and autonomous form.18 In plate 114 (Hauser, 1965) the painting depicts a pastoral scene, the smoothly curving forms of the figures reflecting the swell of the landscape behind them. DellAbbate appears to seek balance and unity as well as beauty in his landscapes. Work such as this contrasts greatly to some of Rossos frescoes where he mixes themes and types of character into one scene. For instance, The Revenge of Nauphlius and The Sacrifice19 where the bishop retreats to the rear of the scene while mothers with children predominate the front Rosso deliberately juxtaposes these figures as he does the elements be by the jugs and the burning offering. As can be seen from the differing work of dellAbbate and Rosso, the Mannerist movement stretched to include a diverse range of subjects and styles. The exploitation of stead in the landscape by dellAbbate and the fresco by Rosso represent two totally opposite conceptions. In one, relatively shallow space is crammed with an incredible accumulation of figures, objects and details in the other, a deep space is created and is left almost completely empty except for the figures threshing the hay. In both cases this draws the eye to the figures and their relationship to each other and their surroundings. As Bosquet says, kind of than the abolition of space, we are confronted in foible with a more complete mastery over the use of space, a freeing of space through plays of perspective or the creation of atmospheric effects.20The use of colour might help explore how such effects were created in the Fontainebleau decorations. In Rossos Venus Frustree (http//www.mu see-chateau-fontainebleau.net.).the entire composition is constructed and coloured to create a undisturbed yet fluid ambience. The utilisation of colour seen in this painting is executed with subtle stridencies and dissonances between the pale female skin inflect and the marble-like male figures in the background. The central figure combines together the colouring and figurative elements of the entire scene she walks to struggleds the right hand side of the painting while looking back behind her thus uniting the two sides. Furthermore, her skin tone is soft, and under painted with the aqua green of her surround, while still imbued with the marble-like qualities of a statue. This amalgamation of different effects is complimented by the use of stucco for the figures of a man and woman which frame the fresco. The interpretation given of this painting21 is that Venus is trying to awake the deadened Love when Mars has left for the war. The scene expresses war coming to disturb the hap py love life. The naked figures in stucco of the young man and woman also suggest the admiration that Rosso held for MichaelangeloIn conclusion, the sixteenth century works at Fontainebleau are diverse in their style and expression. Some of the themes are difficult to decipher as they were specifically created for a closed, aristocratic circle to whom they were perfectly understandable and greatly enjoyed for their information and allegorical expression. There are however consistent themes of myth and simile combined with a dynamic use of space, form and colour. The decorations are knowing in that they embrace new styles and bold subjects while fulfilling the standards of excellence and justness expected by the rulers of the court, and it is of no surprise that such work became an important influence in later classical styles of art.BibliographyBlunt, A., 1953. Art and architecture in France, 1500 to 1700. Melbourne PenguinBousquet, J., and Taylor, S., W., (transltr) 1964. The Painting and Style of the Late spiritual rebirth. New York BrazillerFranklin, D., 1994. Rosso in Italy. capital of the United Kingdom Yale University constringeHauser, A., 1965. pose the crisis of the metempsychosis and the origin of modern art. London RoutledgeHauser, A., 1965. Mannerism the crisis of the conversion and the origin of modern art. (prints). London RoutledgeMarsengil, K., Identity Politics in Renaissance France Cellinis Nymph of Fontainebleau,(http//www.fsu.edu/arh/events/athanor/athxix/AthanorXIX_marsengill.pdf)Shearman, J., 1977. Mannerism Style and Civilisation. Middlesex Penguin.http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherubim.http//www.metmuseum.orghttp//www.musee-chateau-fontainebleau.net.Further ReadingChampney, E.W., 1901, accost of the Renaissance Chateaux. New York PutnamDutton, R., 1957, The Chateaux of France, London BatsfordSterling, C., 1955. A Catalogue of French Paintings. good deal 1. Cambridge Harvard University Press.De Girolami Cheney, L., 1997, Readi ngs in Italian Mannerism. New York Peter Lang.Murray, L., 1977. The High Renaissance and Mannerism the North and Spain, 1500-1600. London Thames and HudsonSmart, A., 1972, The Renaissance and Mannerism outside Italy. London Thames and Hudson.1Footnotes1 Bosquet, J., and Taylor, S., W., (transltr) 1964. The Painting and Style of the Late Renaissance. New York Braziller, p.64. Hereafter cited as Bosquet.2 Bosquet, p.60.3 http//www.chateaudefontainebleau.net4 Bosquet, p.62.5 Shearman, J., 1977. Mannerism Style and Civilisation. Middlesex Penguin, p.121.6 Hauser, A., 1965. Mannerism the crisis of the Renaissance and the origin of modern art.London Routledge, p.242.7 Hauser, A., 1965. Mannerism the crisis of the Renaissance and the origin of modern art.London Routledge, plate 199.8 (http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherubim).9 Blunt, A., 1953. Art and Architecture in France, 1500 to 1700. Melbourne Penguin, p.35. Hereafter cited as Blunt.10 Blunt, p.35.11 Blunt, p.36.12 Blunt, p.36.13 Blunt , p.65. See plate 43A14 Bosquet, p.72.15 Marsengil, K., Identity Politics in Renaissance France Cellinis Nymph of Fontainebleau, (http//www.fsu.edu/arh/events/athanor/athxix/AthanorXIX_marsengill.pdf)16 Ibid, p.2.17 Ibid, p.2.18 Hauser, A., 1965. Mannerism the crisis of the Renaissance and the origin of modern art.London Routledge, p.214.19 Franklin, D., 1994. Rosso in Italy. London Yale University Press, p.199.20 Bosquet, p.143.21 www.musee-chateau-fontainebleau.net.